← Search

Melissa Maxwell

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 23W–26L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Melissa Maxwell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-08-08 · SAC-Hummel · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Krantz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · SAC-Kemple/Larson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jinmi Kemple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-5
W
2026-05-30 · SAC-Kemple/Larson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lara Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · SAC-Kemple/Larson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · SAC-Kemple/Larson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jinmi Kemple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-21 · SAC-Boyce · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lina Gao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · THPRD-Ross-Brockett/Birge · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Clifford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-07 · THPRD-Ross-Brockett/Birge · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · THPRD-Ross-Brockett/Birge · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Stutzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · THPRD-Ross-Brockett/Birge · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Clifford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-18 · THPRD-Ross-Brockett/Birge · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Hagerty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-11 · SAC-Boyce · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toni Lipke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 67.1% of games
3.0
28.6%
8W–20L · 41.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 70.5% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 64.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
5 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova