Search

Currie Person

Portland, OR
3.0S year-end 2025
12 matches · 5W–7L · seasons 20262026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
80%
stay 3.0
20%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
117 of 357
OR · 3.0
193 of 600

Currie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams4 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history12 matches
W
Susan Wang / Yan Li
2026-07-25 · Sets & The City · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grace Hahn
+0.005better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Michelle Chow / Chloe Wu
2026-06-28 · Sets & The City · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Harder
+0.053better than expected — took 100% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Kheoshi Owens / Maribel Bautista Tena
2026-06-07 · MAC-Nguyen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Heinecke
+0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-30 · MAC-Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Heinecke
+0.029better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · MAC-Nguyen · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.006about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-16 · MAC-Nguyen · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.002below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · MAC-Nguyen · #1 Doubles · with Lea Rodgers
+0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Wenping Xue / Rie Yuasachamps
2026-04-11 · MAC-Nguyen · #2 Doubles · with Grace Hahn
0.022below expectation — took 46% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Shuping Li / Ying Dengchamps
2026-04-10 · MAC-Nguyen · #3 Doubles · with Grace Hahn
+0.030better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · MAC-Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grace Hahn
+0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · N OR-MAC-Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Weinstein
+0.025better than expected — took 56% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · N OR-MAC-Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Kelly
+0.046better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.