← Search

Kathy Cooke

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 60W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathy Cooke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Cookies and Crystals · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ounaphom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-04 · Cookies and Crystals · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ounaphom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · Cookies and Crystals · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tate Kuerbis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · Cookies and Crystals · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ounaphom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-03 · Cookies and Crystals · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Cookies and Crystals · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ounaphom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tate Kuerbis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · IRV-Hallock Koppelman/Cooke · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emma Chait
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · IRV-Hallock Koppelman/Cooke · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cecily Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-24 · IRV-Hallock Koppelman/Cooke · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cecily Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · IRV-Hallock Koppelman/Cooke · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nozomi Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
46.8%
36W–41L · 48.7% of games
6.0
75%
9W–3L · 57% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.2% of games
6.0mixed
46.9%
15W–17L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
36 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer