Search

Elizabeth Fox

Beaverton, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
48 matches · 30W–18L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.69
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 3.0
38 of 47
OR · 3.0
507 of 600

Elizabeth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elizabeth has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Elizabeth has gone from the 22nd to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
66.7%
16W–8L · 62.2% of games
3.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 61% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jason Trinchero
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Parker
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Staci Kristin
+0.012better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Kathy Cooke / Cecily Schmidt
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean Kastner
+0.012better than expected — took 57% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Jennifer Trank / Laura Berner
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean Kastner
0.002about as expected — took 45% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Lo
+0.037better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Priscilla Connolly / Heidi Stutzman
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andria Shirk
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Staci Kristin
+0.013about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Mark Lau / Heather Dalemixed
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fenn Bourland
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Ryan Gibson / Jeanne Sinnottmixed
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fenn Bourland
+0.000below expectation — took 46% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
2025-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fenn Bourland
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Ryann Hulme / Angie Corraleschamps
2025-06-28 · #1 Doubles · with Jeanne Sinnott
0.024below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.