← Search

Kathleen Crowley

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 60W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Crowley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
W
2026-07-19 · PTC-Lee/Daoud · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Janes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · PTC-Lee/Daoud · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Siegel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yone Akagi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katja Daoud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-09 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Alley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-03 · PTC-Johnston-Smith/Browne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yone Akagi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-22 · GLVR-Crowley/Daoud · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yone Akagi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-06-12 · Carolan-Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Kinderknecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-10 · Carolan-Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Carolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-07 · GLVR-Crowley/Daoud · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yone Akagi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-01 · GLVR-Crowley/Daoud · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yone Akagi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-05-10 · GLVR-Crowley/Daoud · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yone Akagi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
61.1%
44W–28L · 55.1% of games
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.3% of games
6.0mixed
40%
12W–18L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe