PTC-Lee/Daoud

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25

Tim Janes

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

3.03

Seth Wagner

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

3.01

John Brady

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.91

Jeny Joseph

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.88

Lysa Morla Maxey

usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3

2.86

Michael Navarro

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.79

Ed de la Fuente

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.77

Amy Carolan

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.75

Kathleen Crowley

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3

2.74

Bill Barnes

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.70

Katja Daoud

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Tim Janes

47W–53L career

0%14%86%

3.25

Seth Wagner

51W–76L career

0%73%27%

3.03

John Brady

71W–76L career

0%81%19%

3.01

Jeny Joseph

75W–91L career

0%95%5%

2.91

Lysa Morla Maxey

32W–15L career

0%97%3%

2.88

Michael Navarro

27W–39L career

0%97%3%

2.86

Ed de la Fuente

78W–81L career

0%99%1%

2.79

Amy Carolan

30W–27L career

0%99%0%

2.77

Kathleen Crowley

60W–51L career

4%94%2%

2.75

Bill Barnes

11W–17L career · type M

2%98%0%

2.74

Katja Daoud

71W–70L career

3%97%0%

2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.