Teams

Carolan-Volley Llamas

2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Yone Akagi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Amy Carolan
published 3
2.73
Kathleen Crowley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Katja Daoud
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2025-07-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYone Akagi / Lauren Kinderknecht vs Deanna Williams / Andrea Sanchez6-4, 6-1
2025-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Carolan / Katja Daoud vs Jennifer Oh / Shannon Davis7-6, 7-6
2025-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesYone Akagi / Amy Carolan vs Margo Yohner / Barbara Gram6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYone Akagi / Katja Daoud vs Christy Locke / Marcella Barta6-3, 6-3
2025-06-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYone Akagi / Lauren Kinderknecht vs Monica Conners / Lucia Parker6-0, 6-2
2025-06-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Lauren Kinderknecht vs Barbara Gram / Margo Yohner6-1, 6-0
2025-06-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Carolan / Kathleen Crowley vs Kelley Malama / Amy Marr6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Yone Akagi
66W–52L career
0%98%2%
2.84
3
Amy Carolan
30W–27L career
1%99%0%
2.73
3
Kathleen Crowley
60W–51L career
5%94%1%
2.73
3
Katja Daoud
71W–70L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.