Search

Carol Glenn

Oregon City, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
163 matches · 82W–81L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 3.0
356 of 600

Carol is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams52 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carol has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Carol has gone from the 8th to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.6% of games
3.0
47.1%
32W–36L · 49.3% of games
6.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
68.9%
31W–14L · 58.7% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
4W–14L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history163 matches
W
2026-07-19 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Hopkins
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Richard Marshall / Mandee Schroermixed
2026-06-28 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Abhisar Gupta
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-10 · CRRC-Glenn(s) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Glenn
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 24% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Hayes
+0.015better than expected — took 60% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Kristin DeVoto / Cecily Schmidt
2026-05-03 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
0.037below expectation — took 57% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
JEAN CHEN / Jeane Anastas
2026-04-10 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amory-Katelyn Zschach
+0.010better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · CRRC-Glenn(s) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Glenn
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Lori Merchel / Rebecca Ostrom
2026-03-14 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsea McGraw
+0.040better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Matt Savage / Julie Atchleymixed
2026-03-13 · CRRC-Glenn(s) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Glenn
+0.000better than expected — took 42% of games against 28% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Laura Fredericksen / Barbara Pasmore
2026-03-08 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Jenkins
+0.030better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-07 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Jenkins
0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Mindy Chin / Van Chinh Bui
2026-01-31 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Jenkins
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.