Search

Chelsea McGraw

West Linn, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
63 matches · 33W–30L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.75
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
West Linn · 3.0
18 of 21
OR · 3.0
438 of 600

Chelsea is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chelsea has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Chelsea has gone from the 4th to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
70.4%
19W–8L · 57.7% of games
3.0
25%
5W–15L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheri Mosbrucker
+0.088better than expected — took 100% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheri Mosbrucker
+0.016about as expected — took 25% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alana Miner
0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheri Mosbrucker
0.061below expectation — took 14% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Lori Merchel / Rebecca Ostrom
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Glenn
+0.041better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Jill Otermat / Sun Oh
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anca Ilau
+0.045better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Mindy Chin / Jill Otermat
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Glenn
0.033below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Maryna Kosau / Anuradha Nandagirichamps
2025-08-24 · #1 Doubles · with Sidney Clarke
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Nanxiao Zhang / Sophia Chengchamps
2025-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Sidney Clarke
+0.040about as expected — took 33% of games against 30% expected
1-2
W
Andrea Porter / Kim Pakchamps
2025-08-22 · #1 Doubles · with Cheri Mosbrucker
+0.050better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Glenn
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ryan Owens
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.