← Teams

LOTC-Ash/Johnson

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.15 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Brad Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Julia Henry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.14
Ryan Owens
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.07
Robert Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
Monte Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Roxanna Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Erik Bucher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Carol Glenn
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Karin Owens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-08-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMatt Savage / Nicola Ash vs Jose Hwang / Heather Dale6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesErik Bucher / Crystal Ounaphom vs Jonathan Guinn / Jennifer Kim6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Owens / Anca Ilau vs Nasser Khan / Priscilla Paik6-4, 6-2
2025-08-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMark Hopkins / Julia Henry vs Kathryn Harlan / Michael Lemmons7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMatt Savage / Nicola Ash vs Robert Piercy / Karen Walker6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Chelsea McGraw vs Jeff Marcus / Irina Stolerman6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Roxanna Johnson vs John Vinh / Christin Harrington4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonte Gonzales / Julia Henry vs Heather Edwards / Brian Chenoweth6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Anca Ilau vs Madeleine Bourland / Brian Parker6-4, 7-5
2025-07-25Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / Carol Glenn vs Jing Bennett / Anil Khanna6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrad Johnson / Roxanna Johnson vs John Yu / June Xiao6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatt Savage / Karin Owens vs Ye Jiang / Janene Clark4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / Karin Owens vs Lara Greenberg / Nathan Watson7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMark Hopkins / Carol Glenn vs Michelle Roach / Jeff Mcdougald3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Owens / Chelsea McGraw vs Jinmi Kemple / Lee Anderson6-3, 6-4
2025-07-12Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Roxanna Johnson vs Gilbert Chiang / Carmen Warda2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErik Bucher / Carol Glenn vs Chris Hartson / Lucila Griesser6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / Karin Owens vs Troy Pickard / Susan Sienko6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRyan Owens / Chelsea McGraw vs Scott Soot / Milenka Coltman6-4, 6-2
2025-06-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Roxanna Johnson vs Alice Holland / James Trolio1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErik Bucher / Julia Henry vs Ye Gong / Michael Barrantes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark Hopkins / Nicola Ash vs Johan Hong / Nicole Norby6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Brad Johnson
196W–102L career
0%87%13%
3.48
3
Julia Henry
87W–52L career
0%18%82%
3.22
3.5
Ryan Owens
113W–77L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
14%86%0%
3.07
3
Monte Gonzales
118W–98L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Roxanna Johnson
114W–65L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Erik Bucher
79W–60L career
0%98%1%
2.82
3
Carol Glenn
82W–81L career
0%99%1%
2.79
3
Karin Owens
82W–66L career
1%99%0%
2.77
3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.