Search

Thomas Scanlan

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
30 matches · 10W–20L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
54%
stay 3.0
46%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 87% stay · 13% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
81 of 357
OR · 3.0
133 of 600

Thomas is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Thomas has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.9% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 24.7% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claire Thayer
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Kim-Geib
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Catherine Leedy / Christopher Grahammixed
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claire Thayer
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
N/Amixed
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Harrison
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Kim-Geib
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Julie Atchley / Matt Savagemixed
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily McBride
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · #1 Singles
+0.012better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randall Sinn
0.001below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Kim-Geib
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 72% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Brentley Boger / Dave Gillard
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Santiago Crespo
0.006about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Steve Russell / Ken Embree
2026-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Mehlhorn
+0.047better than expected — took 38% of games against 25% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
John LEONIDAS
2026-03-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.077below expectation — took 20% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.