← Search

Fenn Bourland

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 121W–68L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Fenn Bourland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history189 matches
W
2026-09-12 · THPRD-Omlid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joel Naumoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Subramanyan Murali championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with John Magaddino championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · THPRD-Omlid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Vanderhoff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · THPRD-Omlid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elisa Landers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Jeff Agoos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Omlid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Stevenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · NOR-MAC-Wehner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Howe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · NOR-MAC-Wehner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Agoos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · with Dory Simons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-24 · NOR-MAC-Wehner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Sohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · THPRD-Omlid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dory Simons mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 61% of games
3.5
58.6%
17W–12L · 50.8% of games
6.0
80%
8W–2L · 75.3% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 53.2% of games
6.0mixed
69.8%
30W–13L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
51.4%
19W–18L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
51 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal