Search

Mary Priester

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
39 matches · 14W–25L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.05
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
27%
down to 3.0
73%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 16% down · 84% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.08. Higher than today’s 3.05 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
372 of 399
OR · 3.5
694 of 735

Mary is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mary has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202020222025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Mary has gone from the 11th to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
70%
7W–3L · 62.3% of games
3.5
0%
0W–8L · 28.8% of games
7.0
33.3%
7W–14L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history39 matches
L
Karen Oyler / Suzie Sarkisian
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marilyn Bishop
0.025below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Kirsch
+0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Garrene Mcgale
+0.026better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Candy Dann
0.051below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle DeVaughn
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Claire C Gates
0.023below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Louanne Fuller / Pamela Lagielski
2025-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandy Swift
+0.037better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle DeVaughn
0.043below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Angie Cunningham / Julie Kafoury
2025-02-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Lang
0.068below expectation — took 33% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-01-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Cervantez
0.050below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-11-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Pultz
+0.020better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Riley
0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.