Search

Cathy Cervantez

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
29 matches · 5W–24L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.14
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
5%
down to 3.0
95%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
319 of 399
OR · 3.5
605 of 735

Cathy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cathy has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Cathy has gone from the 10th to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
19%
4W–17L · 40% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history29 matches
L
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Degnan
0.011below expectation — took 42% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Molly Moran / Diana Callaway
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Conway
0.019below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Larson
0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Ramsey
0.013below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Robertson
+0.019about as expected — took 40% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Greenblatt
0.060below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betty Roux
+0.003about as expected — took 32% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Christine Moran / Jing Li
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Robertson
0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Victoria Cartwright / Scott Cartwrightmixed
2025-05-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Archer
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Hesslink
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Newcomb
+0.025better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Murray Jansen
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 73% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.