Search

Diana Callaway

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
42 matches · 7W–35L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 3.0
93%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
330 of 399
OR · 3.5
626 of 735

Diana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams47 teams · 2001–2026
MAC-Cooney/Hopson
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
MAC-Hopson/Cooney
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
MAC-Milan/Fernando
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
MAC-Leedy/Davis
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MAC-Stevenson
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MAC-Lovett
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Diana has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202220252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Diana has gone from the 3rd to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 39.5% of games
4.0
11.1%
2W–16L · 32.3% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 38% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-05-16 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Moran
+0.019better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Christine Steele Smith / Anna Salita
2026-03-21 · MAC-Hopson/Cooney · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheryl Wehner
+0.055better than expected — took 72% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-03-14 · MAC-Hopson/Cooney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Cooney
0.025below expectation — took 46% of games against 56% expected
0-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · MAC-Hopson/Cooney · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Hodgson
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-10 · MAC-Hopson/Cooney · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with TERESA LAWHEAD
+0.035better than expected — took 29% of games against 24% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-11-22 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Schaller
0.048below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-11-02 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Erzen
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-10-25 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Eckelman
0.038below expectation — took 37% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-18 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Desmarais
+0.030better than expected — took 48% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-05-24 · MAC-Stevenson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wright
+0.018about as expected — took 38% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Monica Kendall / Ashley Snieder
2025-05-11 · MAC-Stevenson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Leedy
+0.013about as expected — took 38% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-05-06 · MAC-Stevenson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Williams
0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.