Search

Michele Desmarais

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
101 matches · 56W–45L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.22
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
237 of 399
OR · 3.5
460 of 735

Michele is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams75 teams · 2007–2026
MAC-Hopson/Cooney
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
MAC-Milan/Fernando
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
MAC-Cooney/Hopson
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MAC-Milan/Fernando
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
MAC-Lovett/Go
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2024
MAC-Milan/Fernando
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michele has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Michele has gone from the 62nd to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
60.9%
28W–18L · 54.3% of games
4.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 31.4% of games
7.0
52.2%
12W–11L · 51.5% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-02-28 · MAC-Hopson/Cooney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Popma
0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-25 · MAC-Hopson/Cooney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Cooney
0.015below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-10-18 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Callaway
+0.030better than expected — took 48% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-05 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peg McClendon
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-28 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peg McClendon
0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-03-16 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with TERESA LAWHEAD
0.040below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-03-15 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with America Hopson
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-03-08 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Popma
+0.013below expectation — took 20% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-01-26 · MAC-Cooney/Hopson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with TERESA LAWHEAD
0.010below expectation — took 50% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-11-02 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Milan
0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-10-06 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Milan
0.014below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Julie Arness / Christine Hattenhauer
2024-09-21 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peg McClendon
0.011below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.