← Search

Peg McClendon

Beaverton, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 54W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Peg McClendon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-07-31 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Anne Milan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kaki Brenneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Laura Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-30 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Milan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-12 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-02 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaki Brenneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-25 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Milan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-10-12 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Milan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-05 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Desmarais
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-28 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Desmarais
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-14 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaki Brenneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams105 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.3% of games
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.1% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.7% of games
7.0
50.9%
29W–28L · 50.1% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 30.9% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams