Search

Peg McClendon

Beaverton, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
106 matches · 53W–53L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.27
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 3.5
25 of 55
OR · 3.5
357 of 735

Peg is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams104 teams · 2001–2026
MAC-Milan/Fernando
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
MAC-Lekas/Nichols
2026 Adult 70 & Over · 70 & Over Women
2026
MAC-Milan/Fernando
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
MAC-Milan/Fernando
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson
2025 Adult 70 & Over · 70 & Over Women
2025
MAC-Milan/Fernando
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Peg has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Peg has gone from the 33rd to the 7th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.8% of games
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.1% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.7% of games
7.0
50.9%
29W–28L · 50.1% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 30.9% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history106 matches
W
Fran Hepp / Elaine Sibley
2026-07-21 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
+0.063better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Minhhang Tran / Joanne Kalk
2026-07-17 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kaki Brenneman
+0.004better than expected — took 86% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Margaret Rowland / Sharon Arendes
2026-06-04 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Laura Laney
+0.062better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Susie Palena / Lois Gibson
2026-04-30 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Milan
+0.042better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-12 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laney
0.018below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-02 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaki Brenneman
0.008below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Sarah Larson / Megan Clifford
2025-10-25 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Milan
+0.035better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-10-12 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Milan
0.051below expectation — took 25% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-05 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Desmarais
0.028below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-28 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Desmarais
0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-09-14 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaki Brenneman
0.067below expectation — took 20% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Marlene Huntsinger / Kathy Watanabe
2025-08-21 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Laura Walker
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.