← Search

Megan McCarter

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 82W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Megan McCarter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-06-14 · LOTC-Kraft · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Tufts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · LOTC-Kraft · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Kraft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · LOTC-Kraft · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Devrie Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · LOTC-Kraft · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anh Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-17 · LOTC-Kraft · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Kraft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · LOTC-Kraft · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Tufts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-13 · LOTC-Kraft · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Tufts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · LOTC-Kraft · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Hilden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-21 · LOTC-Kraft · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with MICHELLE LY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-02-06 · LOTC-Kraft · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Tufts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-01-11 · LOTC-Kraft · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Tufts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-06-21 · LOTC-McCarter/Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Ouellette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
72%
54W–21L · 59.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 61.8% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
25 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer