Search

Becky Holzman

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
78 matches · 58W–20L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.41
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
88%
stay 3.5
12%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.35. Lower than today’s 3.41 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
76 of 399
OR · 3.5
157 of 735

Becky is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams38 teams · 2015–2026
NOR-MAC-Lamprecht
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
MAC-Cofield/Lamprecht
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
MAC-Cofield/Lamprecht
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
THPRD-Agrawal
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
MAC-Casebeer/Finn
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Becky has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Becky has gone from the 95th to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 72.2% of games
3.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 58% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 61.2% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-06-20 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · with Andrea Lamprecht
0.077below expectation — took 25% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-19 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · with Andrea Lamprecht
+0.002better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Ella MacPherson / Heather MacPherson
2026-06-07 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tove Maloco
0.013below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Lamprecht
+0.047better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Lamprecht
+0.063better than expected — took 80% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-20 · MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Kafoury
+0.009better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-01-25 · MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tove Maloco
+0.022better than expected — took 92% of games against 70% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-06-28 · MAC-Cofield/Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · with Tove Maloco
0.019below expectation — took 40% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-06-27 · MAC-Cofield/Lamprecht · #2 Doubles · with Tove Maloco
0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-06-21 · MAC-Cofield/Lamprecht · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Desiree Bliss
0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Brittany Donnelly / Betty Roux
2025-06-06 · MAC-Cofield/Lamprecht · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Lamprecht
+0.043better than expected — took 86% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-05-18 · MAC-Cofield/Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tove Maloco
0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.