← Search

Pamela Minor

Vancouver, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
64 matches · 20W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Pamela sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Pamela is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024, 2025, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Pamela has gone from the 18th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
25.8%
8W–23L · 41.7% of games
7.0
32.1%
9W–19L · 46.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan McMullin
−0.022below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Mary T. Palmer / Jane King Ayers
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Baxter
+0.016better than expected — took 43% of games against 38% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Sammie Sue Willenborg / Karen Groenweghe
2025-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Parks
+0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with ROSY ALANIS
−0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Sammie Sue Willenborg / Christine Wall
2025-01-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Shue
−0.007below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-04-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Blunt
−0.027below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-10-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Benedict
−0.025below expectation — took 38% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2023-09-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Self
−0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Michele Snyder / Linda Binns
2023-09-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ramona Kirsch
+0.001about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Benedict
−0.010below expectation — took 40% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-11-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudia Belindean
+0.038better than expected — took 42% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Sandi Martes / Kathy Johnson
2022-11-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Blunt
−0.011below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.