← Teams

CGM-Kropp

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Andrea Kropp
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Vicki Blunt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
LISA KINGDON
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Deborah Self
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
Donna Baxter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
ROSY ALANIS
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.63
Shelley Hutley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.53
Tamara Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-03-15Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Alma Siri6-1, 6-2
2025-03-08Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesEmily Shue / Vicki Blunt vs Michele O'Brien / Nancy Korenek-Leveque4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Katie Terrill6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShelley Hutley / Susan McMullin vs Andrea Hobi / Callen Sterling6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Alisa Rakoz vs Lisa Barsotti / Paula Watt7-5, 6-3
2025-02-22Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesEmily Shue / LISA KINGDON vs Wendi Ouellette / Megan McCarter7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Britani Kavanaugh7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVicki Blunt / Shelley Hutley vs Kara Kraft / Natasha Rinard6-1, 6-1
2025-02-15Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesDelena Palena / Donna Baxter vs Heike Droste / Rebecca Roberts6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Marie Dorsey6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeborah Self / Christina Parks vs Tina Prassas / Cara Williams6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / ROSY ALANIS vs Yuxia Ouyang / Nancy Pan6-1, 6-2
2025-02-08Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesDelena Palena / Donna Baxter vs Dana McKillop / Shannon Rask7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Bethany Bounds6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLISA KINGDON / Tamara Phillips vs America Hopson / TERESA LAWHEAD6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDeborah Self / Christina Parks vs Della Shanley / Caroline Popma6-3, 6-1
2025-02-01Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesLISA KINGDON / Donna Baxter vs Dayna Porter / Karen Pickering6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAndrea Kropp vs Kieu Lam6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPamela Minor / ROSY ALANIS vs Trylla Lembke / Maya Mori7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristina Parks / Deborah Self vs Patti Dybdahl / Rebecca Griffith6-2, 6-3
2025-01-18Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesLISA KINGDON vs Alma Siri6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristina Parks / Deborah Self vs Karla Hendrickson / Christine Taylor6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesROSY ALANIS / Tamara Phillips vs Marlene Enos / Julie Row6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-01-10Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesShelley Hutley / Susan McMullin vs Kathy Ramsey / Lisa Clevenger7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlisa Rakoz / Deborah Self vs Janice Ackley / Marje Ferek7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLISA KINGDON / Tamara Phillips vs Kim Hevia / Maryke Schmidt6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Andrea Kropp
51W–81L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Vicki Blunt
89W–109L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
LISA KINGDON
57W–57L career
12%85%3%
3.20
3
Deborah Self
106W–100L career
0%48%52%
3.12
3.5
Donna Baxter
15W–57L career · type A
39%61%0%
2.99
3
ROSY ALANIS
43W–68L career
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Shelley Hutley
15W–58L career
8%92%0%
2.63
3
Tamara Phillips
66W–129L career
26%74%0%
2.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.