Search

Ramona Kirsch

VANCOUVER, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
28 matches · 14W–14L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
22%
stay 3.0
78%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 68% stay · 32% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.96. Lower than today’s 3.06 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
VANCOUVER · 3.0
3 of 8
WA · 3.0
153 of 755

Ramona is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams41 teams · 2002–2026
6.0 MTC Match Makers W55F
2026 Fall Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over Women Sat
2026
N OR-CGM-Venezia
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2026
CGM-Richards/Weyand
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2025
CGM-Geisler/Blunt
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2024
CGM-Blunt
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
CGM-Kropp
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ramona has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 34.4% of games
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 70.5% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history28 matches
L
Kim Carey / Mary Turinochamps
2026-06-28 · N OR-CGM-Venezia · #1 Doubles · with Joann Szueber
+0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · N OR-CGM-Venezia · #2 Doubles · with Joann Szueber
0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Michelle Burgess / Shirlee Steinerchamps
2026-06-26 · N OR-CGM-Venezia · #2 Doubles · with Larissa Kazantsev
+0.050better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-26 · N OR-CGM-Venezia · #1 Doubles · with Joann Szueber
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Janet Wells / Kimberly Grandy Sember
2025-12-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darci Norberg
+0.044better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Aimee Hombach / Rowena Caviles
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Taylor
+0.021better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Margie Vasquez / Lori Dickman
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Taylor
+0.071better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Rhonda Baker / Kelley Schultz
2025-11-01 · N OR-CGM-Venezia · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alisa Rakoz
+0.060better than expected — took 75% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-18 · N OR-CGM-Venezia · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alisa Rakoz
+0.020better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-09-28 · CGM-Richards/Weyand · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chana Dolbey
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-09-21 · CGM-Richards/Weyand · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Erin Corzine
2024-06-15 · CGM-Blunt · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.035below expectation — took 55% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.