← Teams

CGM-Blunt

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Tammy Kitterman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Vicki Blunt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Deborah Self
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.99
Donna Baxter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Ramona Kirsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.76
ROSY ALANIS
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.76
Shannon Lucas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Shelley Hutley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Tamara Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results7 ties
2024-06-22Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Brooke Henderson vs Amy Cooney / TERESA LAWHEAD6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShelley Hutley / Tammy Kitterman vs Christy Buckman / Tracey Hodgson7-5, 6-3
2024-06-15Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesDeborah Self / ROSY ALANIS vs Wendie Nowacki / Carol Spencer6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRamona Kirsch vs Erin Corzine7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Baxter / Shannon Lucas vs Eve Krauel / Joy Kolesnikoff6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Brooke Henderson vs Crystal Ounaphom / Victoria Cartwright2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-02Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesROSY ALANIS / Deborah Self vs Kimberly Lanier / Jennifer Noble7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesShannon Lucas vs Rachel Connell6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVicki Blunt / Ramona Kirsch vs Devrie Brennan / Maribeth Cadieux6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Brooke Henderson vs Jing Li / Christine Steele Smith6-0, 6-3
2024-05-26Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Emily Shue vs Tomoko Iwata / Reiko Maeda6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTamara Phillips / Shannon Lucas vs Kim Boston / Annette Hill6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDelena Palena / ROSY ALANIS vs Jennifer Pultz / Miriam Habafy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-19Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesTamara Phillips / Donna Baxter vs Jian Xu / Kim Tellin6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesShannon Lucas vs Joanna Asia Wagner3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVicki Blunt / Shelley Hutley vs Robin Fernstrom / Timothea Barnatan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesROSY ALANIS / Alisa Rakoz vs Ellen Hodges / Nicola Ash6-2, 6-2
2024-04-27Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesEmily Shue / Deborah Self vs Tomoko Iwata / Amy Ouellette6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDelena Palena / Shelley Hutley vs Colleen Kellogg / Annette Hill6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesROSY ALANIS / Angela Benedict vs Kim Boston / Nina Bakos6-2, 6-3
2024-04-20Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesPamela Minor / Vicki Blunt vs Nina Hanson / Kari Hastings6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDeborah Self vs Morgan Cowling6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShelley Hutley / Angela Benedict vs Ariana White / Lauren Larsen6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlisa Rakoz / ROSY ALANIS vs Kimberly Parks / Thu Truong6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Tammy Kitterman
11W–17L career · type S
0%31%69%
3.70
3.5
Vicki Blunt
89W–109L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3
Deborah Self
106W–100L career
0%48%52%
3.12
3.5
Donna Baxter
15W–57L career · type A
39%61%0%
2.99
3
Ramona Kirsch
14W–14L career
0%82%18%
2.97
3
ROSY ALANIS
43W–68L career
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Shannon Lucas
18W–12L career
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Shelley Hutley
15W–58L career
8%92%0%
2.63
3
Tamara Phillips
66W–129L career
26%74%0%
2.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.