← Teams

CGM-Geisler/Blunt

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.22 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Tammy Kitterman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Cheryl Geisler
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Vicki Blunt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Deborah Self
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.99
Donna Baxter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Ramona Kirsch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Alana Rhea
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Shelley Hutley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.53
Tamara Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-11-12Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Cheryl Geisler vs Alison Davis / Laura Laney6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan McMullin / Shelley Hutley vs Kim Wright / Nina Sanna6-1, 7-6
2023-10-28Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Susan McMullin vs Jing Li / Saki Newman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVicki Blunt / Shelley Hutley vs Lisa Cohns / Jaymi Sladen6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesClaudia Belindean / Deborah Self vs Susan Browning / Joann Donahue6-2, 6-1
2023-10-21Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Cheryl Geisler vs Lynn Moore / Pat Kaplan6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan McMullin / Shelley Hutley vs Inge Marshall / Nancy Collins6-3, 6-2
2023-10-15Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesDonna Baxter / Alana Rhea vs Robin Welter / Chris van Leeuwen6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt vs Diane Macdonald / Monica Christensen6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRamona Kirsch / Tammy Kitterman vs Rebecca Harris / Nancy Kane6-3, 6-2
2023-10-07Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesItsuko Day / Ramona Kirsch vs Nancy Atkins / Mary Jesse2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Alana Rhea vs Kathy Briscoe / Ann Cassin6-2, 6-3
2023-09-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAngela Benedict / Cheryl Geisler vs Linda Castaneda / Catherine Greenblatt7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPamela Minor / Deborah Self vs Sarah Robertson / Karen Kraus6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTammy Kitterman / Shelley Hutley vs Jeny Joseph / Laura Shier7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-24Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesSusan McMullin / Cheryl Geisler vs Cori Pierce / Nozomi Bray6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRamona Kirsch / Pamela Minor vs Michele Snyder / Linda Binns4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / Deborah Self vs Nicole Floyd / Linda Degnan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-17Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt vs Michele Waite / Tuni Stecker6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRamona Kirsch / Susan McMullin vs Shirley Derby / Cecile Bamer7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTammy Kitterman / Shelley Hutley vs Julie Arness / Karen Walker6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Tammy Kitterman
11W–17L career · type S
0%31%69%
3.70
3.5
Cheryl Geisler
124W–100L career
0%97%3%
3.39
3.5
Vicki Blunt
89W–109L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3
Deborah Self
106W–100L career
0%48%52%
3.12
3.5
Donna Baxter
15W–57L career · type A
39%61%0%
2.99
3
Ramona Kirsch
14W–14L career
0%82%18%
2.97
3
Alana Rhea
78W–88L career
0%99%0%
2.77
3
Shelley Hutley
15W–58L career
8%92%0%
2.63
3
Tamara Phillips
66W–129L career
26%74%0%
2.53

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.