MAC-Hopson/Cooney

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33

Christy Buckman

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.30

Sheryl Wehner

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5

3.24

Amy Cooney

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.22

Michele Desmarais

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.21

America Hopson

usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.17

Caroline Popma

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.15

Amy Risch

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5

3.12

Diana Callaway

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.08

Tracey Hodgson

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.03

Kathleen Cooney

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5

Christy Buckman

30W–33L career

0%97%3%

3.33

3.5

Sheryl Wehner

22W–18L career

1%98%1%

3.30

3.5

Amy Cooney

43W–50L career

3%96%1%

3.24

3.5

Michele Desmarais

56W–45L career

7%92%2%

3.22

3.5

America Hopson

22W–43L career

5%95%1%

3.21

3.5

Caroline Popma

45W–30L career

9%90%1%

3.17

3.5

Amy Risch

46W–36L career

7%93%0%

3.15

3.5

Diana Callaway

7W–35L career

13%87%0%

3.12

3.5

Tracey Hodgson

29W–34L career · type A

23%77%0%

3.08

3.5

Kathleen Cooney

47W–71L career

28%72%0%

3.03

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.