← Search

Victoria Cartwright

SAN DIEGO, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 58W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Victoria Cartwright to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hikari Blancarte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · SD 3.5 ECCTA/ Limon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hikari Blancarte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-24 · SD 3.5 ECCTA/ Limon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Ferrari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Klich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Cartwright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · SD 3.5 ECCTA/ Limon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabriela LARA
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Cartwright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · SD 3.5 ECCTA/ Limon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Cartwright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2016–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
46.2%
37W–43L · 48.6% of games
3.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 38.5% of games
6.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.6% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 41.2% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#1 Singles
30%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
17 matches
#2 Singles
11%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova