Search

Lara McFarlin

San Diego, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
45 matches · 35W–10L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.52
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
San Diego · 3.0
1 of 23
CA · 3.0
1 of 51
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Lara is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lara has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 2 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Lara has gone from the 74th to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 67.8% of games
3.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 59.4% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Sahd
0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Valerie Garcia / Guadalupe Acosta
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jo Ann Stewart
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
W
Amy Tran / Kaili Ghio
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Slaaf
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-2
W
Kris Temple / Hannah Sawyer
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meg Hagan
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
W
Rachel Cline / Stacy Nideffer
2026-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jo Ann Stewart
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meg Hagan
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Elizabeth Estevane / Gwang-Myung Kimmixed
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Faltico
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
Jacqueline Allen / Kim Slaaf
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Sahd
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Kaili Ghio / Amy Tran
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Slaaf
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Julie Gomezchamps
2026-06-22 · #1 Singles
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Shelly Patriquin / June Li
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Klaudia Kapinos
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.070better than expected — took 75% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.