← Search

Elizabeth Estevane

Chula Vista, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
96 matches · 48W–48L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.44
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
76%
stay 3.5
24%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.38. Lower than today’s 3.44 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Chula Vista · 3.5
8 of 14
CA · 3.5
79 of 167
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Elizabeth is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elizabeth has been 3.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Elizabeth has gone from the 49th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 59.5% of games
3.5
50%
22W–22L · 49.5% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.4% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.2% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Olson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Sherri Murphy / Brett Bennettmixedchamps
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Linda Olson
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Elizabeth Nunez / Holly Webermixedchamps
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · with Linda Olson
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kris Temple
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pat St Onge
+0.060better than expected — took 71% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gwang-Myung Kim
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
Dania Michelle Castillo / Klaudia Kapinos
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Edge
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-2
W
Jill McKee / Felicia Kappes
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Olson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
W
Gina White / Brenda Henriquez
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Olson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
George Annobil / Yekaterina Smotrichmixed
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Desmarais
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
Colleen Hartman / David Klichmixed
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jere Halligan
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jere Halligan
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.