Teams

SD 3.5 Balboa TC (3:1)/ Mallory

2026 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5 WD

17 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-19vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (2:2)/ StanleyWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnna Brigham / Tori Penick vs Yasuko Stanley / Rosie Wagner6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Neivert vs Cynthia Hensersky3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Mallory / Candace Gyure vs Kelly Morgan / Cheryl Roche6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Edge / Whitney Johnson vs Karen Shibuya / Rosemarie De Silva6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesTori Penick / Jacinthe Pare vs Jacqueline Allen / Kim Slaaf7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCarrie Bolger vs Christiana Thieler7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPeggy Cuppy / Jennifer Neivert vs Victoria Pearce / Susan Schraeder2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebra McKeon / Lisa Mallory vs Yuka Ishikawa / Betsy Witt3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesPeggy Cuppy / Diane Edge vs Pam Trent / Michelle VANN6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJennifer Neivert vs Meg Hagan0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMegumi Bolger / Linda Olson vs Lisa Carey / Kelley Axelson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Morris / Monica La Crue vs Karen Sahd / Au-Co MAI6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-26vs SD LLW 3.5WD Mtn View/ PonceLost 13
L#1 DoublesLinda Olson / Elizabeth Estevane vs Herta Ixtlahuac / Lilyan Ruiz2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCarrie Bolger vs Maria Cristina Hach1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Edge / Whitney Johnson vs Celia Hernandez / Irma Ibarra3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Morris / Peggy Cuppy vs Irene Roberts / Beliz Iristay6-4, 6-2
2026-02-12vs SD 3.5 Barnes TC (2:2)/ FigueroaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMegumi Bolger / Elizabeth Estevane vs Maria Salas Kazmi / Denisse Fax1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Neivert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Mallory / Debra McKeon vs Noelia Figueroa / Guadalupe Acosta5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWhitney Johnson / Monica La Crue vs Stacy Tomita / Rebecca Robb3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-29vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (2:2)/ KleinerWon 31
W#1 DoublesLinda Olson / Elizabeth Estevane vs Sheryl Putnam / Melinda Meader6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMonica La Crue vs Paige Hazard3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPeggy Cuppy / Jacinthe Pare vs Elyse Wurster / Bridy Oreshack6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCarrie Bolger / Anna Brigham vs Lori Jellison / Carla Fox6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-01-22vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (2:2)/ MonzonLost 13
L#1 DoublesTori Penick / Jacinthe Pare vs Irene Steinwinder / Claudia Gallego Gutierrez4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesWhitney Johnson vs Agnieszka Giacalone2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Edge / Candace Gyure vs Mary Garvey / Lorena Monzon2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Mallory / Carol Morris vs Kate Gill / Erin Smith3-6, 5-7
2026-01-15vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC (2:2)/ HackworthSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLisa Mallory / Jennifer Neivert vs Elsie Hammond / Nellie Harris Ritter4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWhitney Johnson vs Lisa Shirley5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDebra McKeon / Carol Morris vs Ana Paula Gonzalez / Caroline Mickel3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMer Chiodo / Peggy Cuppy vs Heather Grimes / Karin Copp6-4, 6-3
2026-01-08vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (2:2)/ PadillaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKaty Falkowski / Anna Brigham vs Endy Sevilla / Margie Delapaz5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Neivert vs Adriana Diaz0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMer Chiodo / Carrie Bolger vs Bea Vega / Emma Sanchez6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Edge / Debra McKeon vs Shiowling Jenkins / Frances Simpson Lang6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · SD - Women - 3.5 WD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD 3.5 Peninsula TC (2:2)/ Wilkinson81261025271
2SD LLW 3.5WD Mtn View/ Ponce72251130265
3SD 3.5 SDTRC (2:2)/ Monzon72201636301
4SD 3.5 Pacific Beach TC (2:2)/ Ishikawa63211536311
5SD 3.5 Coronado TC (2:2)/ West63211539323
6SD 3.5 LJTC (3:1)/ Bruno54201638304
7SD 3.5 Balboa TC (3:1)/ Mallory45181843344
8SD 3.5 SDTRC (2:2)/ Kleiner45122451350
9SD 3.5 Mtn View (2:2)/ Stanley36191740315
10SD 3.5 Barnes TC (2:2)/ Figueroa27102654366
11SD 3.5 Coronado TC (2:2)/ Hackworth18132348359
12SD 3.5 Mtn View (2:2)/ Padilla18112557380

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Whitney Johnson
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Megumi Bolger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Debra McKeon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Jacinthe Pare
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Diane Edge
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Elizabeth Estevane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Tori Penick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Peggy Cuppy
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Anna Brigham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Monica La Crue
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Mer Chiodo
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Candace Gyure
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Carol Morris
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Jennifer Neivert
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.77
Carrie Bolger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Katy Falkowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Olson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Cuppy + Jacinthe Pare9256% games+6.1% vs expected
Anna Brigham + Tori Penick4549% games+1.7% vs expected
Jacinthe Pare + Tori Penick9850% games−6.3% vs expected
Peggy Cuppy + Anna Brigham6950% gamesnot enough data
Anna Brigham + Candace Gyure4349% gamesnot enough data
Jacinthe Pare + Anna Brigham4250% gamesnot enough data
Debra McKeon + Carol Morris123 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Johnson + Diane Edge123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Johnson
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.64
3.5
Megumi Bolger
48W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Debra McKeon
20W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Jacinthe Pare
67W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Diane Edge
9W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Elizabeth Estevane
50W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Tori Penick
49W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Peggy Cuppy
42W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Anna Brigham
56W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Monica La Crue
57W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Mer Chiodo
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Candace Gyure
128W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3.5
Carol Morris
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Jennifer Neivert
9W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Carrie Bolger
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Katy Falkowski
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Linda Olson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.