← Search

Linda Olson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Diego, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
363 matches · 171W–192L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history363 matches
W
2026-10-25 · SD 3.5 BTC Sunday Slammers / Edwards · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megumi Bolger
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-10-22 · SD 3.5 Balboa TC/ Frazer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Estevane
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · SD 3.5 BTC Sunday Slammers / Edwards · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megumi Bolger
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Beth Dickinson
2026-09-12 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megumi Bolger championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megumi Bolger championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Estevane championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-15 · SD 7.0 Incredoubles @BTC/ Bolger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Desmarais mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · SD LLW WE 7.0 Balboa Racquettes/ Estevane · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megumi Bolger
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-07 · SDC Linda Olson · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · SD LLW WE 7.0 Balboa Racquettes/ Estevane · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Estevane
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Estevane championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
83.3%
15W–3L · 60.2% of games
3.5
43.7%
80W–103L · 47.4% of games
7.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.1% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.1% of games
7.0mixed
48.8%
41W–43L · 50.7% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
117 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
57 matches
Singles
15%
55 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer