Search

Garrene Mcgale

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
121 matches · 38W–83L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.28
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
172 of 399
OR · 3.5
347 of 735

Garrene is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Garrene has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Garrene has gone from the 18th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
33.8%
23W–45L · 46% of games
7.0
32%
8W–17L · 42.2% of games
7.0mixed
24%
6W–19L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history121 matches
W
Monica Christensen / Heather Graham
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lupine Swanson
+0.013better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Skoog
+0.024better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Nies
+0.013about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Faye Leverman / Shaylin Murphy
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jing Li
+0.029better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Skoog
+0.023better than expected — took 52% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Schnadig
+0.046better than expected — took 63% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.013below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Devrie Brennan
+0.031better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-12-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Ayers
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle DeVaughn
0.019below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Theresa Biagioli / Deborah Self
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle DeVaughn
0.014below expectation — took 43% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Kellogg
+0.024better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.