Search

Nina Bakos

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
66 matches · 42W–24L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.47
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
66%
stay 3.5
34%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 91% stay · 9% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.39. Lower than today’s 3.47 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
39 of 399
OR · 3.5
92 of 735

Nina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams17 teams · 2017–2026
PTC-Hill/Habafy
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
PT&E/SJRC-Kellogg
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2026
N OR-PTC-Hill
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
PTC-Hill/Ouellette
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
PT&E/SJRC-Kellogg/Hill
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
PTC-Ouellette/Hill
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nina has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520202023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Nina has gone from the 39th to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
67.6%
25W–12L · 59.8% of games
7.0mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-06-20 · PTC-Hill/Habafy · #1 Singles
0.004below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Abigail Taylor
2026-06-14 · PTC-Hill/Habafy · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.001better than expected — took 72% of games against 66% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-06-07 · PTC-Hill/Habafy · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.024better than expected — took 92% of games against 70% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · PTC-Hill/Habafy · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.015better than expected — took 53% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · PTC-Hill/Habafy · #1 Singles
+0.019better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Annabella Corvelli
2026-04-05 · PTC-Hill/Habafy · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.002better than expected — took 86% of games against 73% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-28 · PTC-Hill/Habafy · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.015better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-06 · N OR-PTC-Hill · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-21 · N OR-PTC-Hill · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · N OR-PTC-Hill · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.013better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-01-10 · N OR-PTC-Hill · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.023better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-11-23 · PT&E/SJRC-Kellogg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris MacMillan
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.