← Search

Eric Ayers

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 78W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Ayers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
W
2026-08-02 · MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kate Kearney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Devrie Brennan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · MPRC-Alfonso/Tompkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane King Ayers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Lamone Voravongseng championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · MPRC-Voravongseng · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lamone Voravongseng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-24 · MPRC-Voravongseng · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lamone Voravongseng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-05-10 · MPRC-Voravongseng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Shih
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-08 · MPRC-Voravongseng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xiaolin Nan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · MPRC-Voravongseng · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xiaolin Nan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-22 · MPRC-Voravongseng/Clark · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Blanchard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-21 · MPRC-Voravongseng/Clark · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Blanchard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-01 · MPRC-Voravongseng/Clark · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phillip Hyun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 53.5% of games
3.5
44.7%
17W–21L · 48% of games
6.0mixed
65.9%
27W–14L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
34.8%
8W–15L · 39.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova