Search

Pamela Lagielski

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
47 matches · 24W–23L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.0
25 of 53
WA · 3.0
839 of 1107

Pamela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Pamela has gone from the 29th to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 56.5% of games
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 63.6% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.4% of games
7.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
W
Lynda Borja / Barbara Maughan
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Jane Toolson
0.023below expectation — took 62% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Shawn West / Lynne Bowman
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Anna Boyarshinova
+0.017better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Anna Boyarshinova
+0.027better than expected — took 68% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Cherie Sivell / Joanne Kalk
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jane Kim
+0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Ann Burns / Shirley Derby
2025-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Jane Toolson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Laureen Thorsen / Mary Shackleton
2025-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Anne Walsh
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Louanne Fuller
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-2
W
Dinah Adkins / Shawn West
2024-08-26 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Jane Toolson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Madeline Shotwell / Fran Hepp
2024-08-14 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Gayle Bingham
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Cathryn Todd / Linda Harrold
2024-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Hendrix
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.