Search

Louanne Fuller

Vancouver, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
89 matches · 46W–43L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
6%
down to 3.0
94%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.5
35 of 39
WA · 3.5
1057 of 1209

Louanne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Louanne has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 0.0, Louanne has gone from the 74th to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 59.7% of games
3.5
50%
10W–10L · 49.3% of games
7.0
57.6%
19W–14L · 54.3% of games
8.0
10%
1W–9L · 35.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandra Seyler
0.027below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Susan Bradley / Margaret Rowland
2026-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Hendrix
0.040below expectation — took 41% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Dee Dee Elsey / Julie Mathews
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
0.026below expectation — took 62% of games against 68% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
0.072below expectation — took 29% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
+0.001about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
+0.035better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-08-14 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Hendrix
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Hendrix
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-1
W
Madeline Shotwell / Evie Fuson
2025-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-2
W
Connie Goffe / JoCarol Nesset-Sale
2025-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Hendrix
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-2
L
Sandi Martes / Janet de Morgan
2025-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Hendrix
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.