Search

Judy van Gasse

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
60 matches · 36W–24L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.14
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
317 of 399
OR · 3.5
599 of 735

Judy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Judy has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 2 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Judy has gone from the 30th to the 83rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
94.1%
16W–1L · 63.7% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 50.8% of games
8.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
Sandra Seyler / Louanne Fuller
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Moore
+0.027better than expected — took 59% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Moore
0.006about as expected — took 54% of games against 57% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Susan Putterman / Susan Bradley
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandi Martes
0.039below expectation — took 47% of games against 64% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Briggs-Ramm
0.054below expectation — took 59% of games against 75% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Moore
0.023below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Jennifer Bayless / Sue Griffith
2026-04-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Briggs-Ramm
0.016about as expected — took 55% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Moore
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-4
W
Jean Jensen / Jeanne McGinnis
2025-08-21 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Moore
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandi Martes
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-1
W
Gwen van Meter / Madeline Shotwell
2025-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandi Martes
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-0
L
Sue Edmonds / Sandra Seyler
2025-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Moore
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Zagunis
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.