← Search

Sandy Swift

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 45W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sandy Swift to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-07-31 · PT&E-Todd/Harrold · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Judy Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · PT&E-Todd/Harrold · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Judy Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-14 · THPRD-Briscoe/Garland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Murrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-16 · THPRD-Briscoe/Garland · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Cassin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · THPRD-Briscoe/Garland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Murrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-11 · THPRD-Reese/Ellis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-11 · PT&E/SJRC-Edwardsen/Todd · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Judy Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-27 · PT&E/SJRC-Edwardsen/Todd · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Nancy Kirsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-10 · PT&E/SJRC-Edwardsen/Todd · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Priester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-05-16 · THPRD-Briscoe/Garland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-05-08 · THPRD-Briscoe/Garland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-05-07 · THPRD-Briscoe/Garland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Murrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams108 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 55.7% of games
3.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 47.8% of games
7.0
46.7%
21W–24L · 51.6% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe