← Search

Jane Kim

Camas, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 7W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jane Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
W
2026-08-14 · VTC-Dybdahl/Hendrix · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandra Seyler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · VTC-Dybdahl/Hendrix · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-18 · VTC-Dybdahl/Hendrix · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Hendrix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · VTC-Dybdahl/Hendrix · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Pamela Lagielski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-04-04 · VTC-Dybdahl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Hendrix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-03-28 · VTC-Dybdahl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Duncan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-03-19 · VTC-Dybdahl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Moffat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2024-03-14 · VTC-Dybdahl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Dybdahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-03-10 · ET-Weinstock · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Pickens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-24 · ET-Weinstock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Moffat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-01-28 · ET-Weinstock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-11-11 · ET-Weinstock · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phillip Heaston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2010–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 72.5% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 66.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 35.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King