← Teams

ET-Weinstock

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Natasha Weinstock
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Puntrigar Suriyaseang
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Jane Kim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Kara Petracca
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.14
Shelly Griffith
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Teresa Zhao
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
—
Jane Moffat
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
Michelle Bunje
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
Results10 ties
2024-03-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bane / Kara Petracca vs Andrea Yao / Shannon Chen6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJane Kim / Amy Pickens vs Sabine Verbiest / Susan Elmer6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesPuntrigar Suriyaseang vs Jill Boyce6-3, 7-5
2024-03-03Lost 0–5
L#1 DoublesJocelyn Smith / Kara Petracca vs Louanne Fuller / Katrina Phillips6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesPuntrigar Suriyaseang vs Danielle Barrett6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichelle Bunje / Jennifer Bane vs Kyra John / Lynne Nieda6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesNatasha Weinstock vs Sarah Marcille6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJane Moffat / Amelia Ryan vs Vanessa Weber / Teresa Darling6-3, 6-1
2024-02-24Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesJane Moffat / Jane Kim vs Kim Wright / Cara Liu2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNatasha Weinstock vs Rosella Leahy6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Bunje / Teresa Zhao vs Nancy Williams / Tracey Hodgson7-6, 7-5
L#2 SinglesShelly Griffith vs Kristin Campbell7-5, 6-3
2024-02-03Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesNatasha Weinstock / Puntrigar Suriyaseang vs Rachel Novak / Gretchen Newcomb7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJane Moffat / Jennifer Bane vs Miki Han / Elizabeth Raman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Zhao / Amy Pickens vs Karen Kraus / Sarah Larson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-28Lost 2–3
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bane / Jane Kim vs Laura Maginnis / Heike Droste6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPuntrigar Suriyaseang vs Tina Prassas6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKara Petracca / Jannell Cuddy vs Lupine Swanson / Jing Li6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNatasha Weinstock vs Rachel Connell7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Bunje / Amy Pickens vs Kathy Cook / Jan Koenig6-2, 6-0
2024-01-20Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesKara Petracca / Jocelyn Smith vs Kaie Wellman / Christie Herkert6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNatasha Weinstock vs Michelle Johnson6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Bane / Jane Moffat vs Christine Bennett-Hanes / Shawn Sefchick6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesShelly Griffith vs Christina Melander6-1, 6-0
2024-01-06Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesJocelyn Smith / Kara Petracca vs Melissa Smith / Dayna Jahnke-Corwin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Moffat / Amelia Ryan vs JaReda Webb / Barbara Dusicka6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesNatasha Weinstock vs Kourtnie Katayama7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPuntrigar Suriyaseang / Teresa Zhao vs Terry Mettler / Margaret Convery6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-12-10Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesNatasha Weinstock / Alex Kokkinakis vs Kimberly Downie / Andrew Petersen6-3, 6-2
2023-12-09Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesBrian Hoyt / Natasha Weinstock vs Tony Hitter / Wendi Ouellette6-2, 6-2
2023-12-08Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesNatasha Weinstock / Alex Kokkinakis vs Alvin Lym / Kiera Hanrahan6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Natasha Weinstock
33W–31L career
0%90%10%
3.45
3.5
Puntrigar Suriyaseang
33W–49L career
0%99%1%
3.32
3.5
Jane Kim
6W–8L career
10%86%4%
3.22
3.5
Kara Petracca
73W–40L career
4%96%0%
3.16
3.5
Shelly Griffith
2W–7L career · type S
14%86%1%
3.14
3.5
Teresa Zhao
46W–34L career
24%76%0%
3.03
3
Jane Moffat
39W–40L career
not enough data
—
3
Michelle Bunje
15W–19L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.