← Search

Jennifer Bane

Camas, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 46W–41L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Jennifer Bane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2025-07-26 · VTC-Chiu · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sekona Taufa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-07-22 · Palena/Blunt-The Volley Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Geisler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-19 · VTC-Chiu · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sekona Taufa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2025-07-14 · Palena/Blunt-The Volley Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Ince
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-06-15 · VTC-Chiu · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Haynes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-14 · VTC-Barrett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Weinstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-12 · Palena/Blunt-The Volley Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Palena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-05-04 · VTC-Barrett · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Palena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-04-06 · VTC-Barrett · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Palena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-03-16 · VTC-Mills/John · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Palena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-03-01 · VTC-Mills/John · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Edmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-02-02 · VTC-Mills/John · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalya Ramras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
52.1%
25W–23L · 51.3% of games
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 42.8% of games
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 60.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#1 Singles
10%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams