← Teams

VTC-Mills/Porter

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Shaoping Lin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.46
John Crouter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.29
Pete Kovalenko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Lynne Nieda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Janet Mills
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Dayna Porter
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Ramon Tuason
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Christina Bergstrom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Charles Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Bradley Perry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results7 ties
2022-11-06Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRamon Tuason / Natalya Ramras vs Kim Wright / Richard Sohn6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDayna Porter / Bradley Perry vs Tove Maloco / Zachary Wright6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLynne Nieda / Charles Stewart vs Barbara Gram / Chresten Gram6-4, 6-1
2022-11-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKasia Boslaugh / John Crouter vs Karina Frid / Benjamin LeVine6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristina Bergstrom / Shaoping Lin vs Chris MacMillan / Nina Bakos5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRamon Tuason / Dayna Porter vs Annette Hill / Tri Pham6-4, 6-1
2022-10-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJohn Crouter / Kasia Boslaugh vs Dean Waters / Rebecca Griffith6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCharles Stewart / Dayna Porter vs Murray Jansen / Suki Birge6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBradley Perry / Janet Mills vs Michael Jansen / Erin Doucet6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJohn Crouter / Kasia Boslaugh vs Kyle McGovern / Gina Ossanna6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShaoping Lin / Christina Bergstrom vs Alex McIntosh / Carly Vendegna6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMike E Kluvia / Janet Mills vs Huy Bui / Gabriela McIntosh6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-09-24Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesShaoping Lin / Christina Bergstrom vs Amy Bucher / Erik Bucher6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPete Kovalenko / Jennifer Bane vs Christina Wright / Jason Hyde6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Stewart / Lynne Nieda vs Chanon Ogden / Michael Ogden6-4, 6-4
2022-09-18Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJanet Mills / John Crouter vs Katrina Heiles / Timothy Johnson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRamon Tuason / Natalya Ramras vs Vicki Blunt / Kenneth Kaufman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKasia Boslaugh / Bradley Perry vs Cheryl Geisler / Charles Hahn6-4, 6-2
2022-09-10Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesChristina Bergstrom / Shaoping Lin vs Suresh Chand / Rie Sasakawa6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPete Kovalenko / Dayna Porter vs Xiaolu Huang / Gabriel Weaver6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLynne Nieda / Mike E Kluvia vs John Liao / Jinquan Wu6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Shaoping Lin
42W–46L career
not enough data
—
4
John Crouter
21W–21L career
48%52%0%
3.46
3.5
Pete Kovalenko
24W–28L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Lynne Nieda
62W–51L career
1%99%0%
3.28
3.5
Janet Mills
66W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Dayna Porter
81W–74L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Ramon Tuason
59W–74L career
9%91%0%
3.12
3
Christina Bergstrom
67W–50L career
0%76%24%
2.97
3
Charles Stewart
37W–61L career
7%87%6%
2.78
0
Bradley Perry
8W–14L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.