← Teams

VTC-Tuason/John

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Shaoping Lin
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.29
Pete Kovalenko
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Lynne Nieda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Patrick Clancy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.24
Janet Mills
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Stephen Crook
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.19
Kyra John
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Ramon Tuason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Christina Bergstrom
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-03-11Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesPatrick Clancy / Kasia Boslaugh vs Manoj Pandya / Erin Casey6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRamon Tuason / Christina Bergstrom vs TRIET NGUYEN / Thu Johnson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStephen Crook / Jennifer Bane vs Alan Liang / Jing Feng6-0, 6-1
2023-03-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPatrick Clancy / Christina Bergstrom vs Robert Gettle / Nichole Anglin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPete Kovalenko / Janet Mills vs Elicia Putnam / John van Leeuwen7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKyra John / Stephen Crook vs Mike Baker / Rhonda Baker7-6, 6-2
2023-03-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKasia Boslaugh / Ramon Tuason vs Lawrence Cooper / Heike Droste3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKyra John / Pete Kovalenko vs Erik Bucher / Mary Green-Zwemke4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bane / Stephen Crook vs Robert Glenn / Carol Glenn6-3, 7-5
2023-02-26Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJanet Mills / Patrick Clancy vs Matt Curtis / Kristin Spear6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKyra John / Pete Kovalenko vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristina Bergstrom / Shaoping Lin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRamon Tuason / Kasia Boslaugh vs Tina Prassas / Eric Halvorson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShaoping Lin / Christina Bergstrom vs Susan Douglas / Seth Yount6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatrick Clancy / Lynne Nieda vs Naun Yvonne Kim / Zack Hegge6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-02-04Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesPatrick Clancy / Lynne Nieda vs Frank Shen / Thu Johnson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephen Crook / Jennifer Bane vs Alan Liang / Jing Feng6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPete Kovalenko / Christina Bergstrom vs Zachary Wright / Kim Wright6-4, 6-4
2023-01-15Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesPatrick Clancy / Kasia Boslaugh vs John Liao / Jinquan Wu1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShaoping Lin / Christina Bergstrom vs Sev Flores / Debbie Spitzer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bane / Pete Kovalenko vs Bin He / Suresh Chand5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-01-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPatrick Clancy / Kasia Boslaugh vs Gregg Hardy / Nina Bakos6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristina Bergstrom / Shaoping Lin vs Annette Hill / Tri Pham3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRamon Tuason / Jennifer Bane vs Colleen Kellogg / Gabor Muskat6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Shaoping Lin
42W–46L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Pete Kovalenko
24W–28L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Lynne Nieda
62W–51L career
1%99%0%
3.28
3.5
Patrick Clancy
25W–36L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Janet Mills
66W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Stephen Crook
55W–66L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Kyra John
42W–40L career
3%96%0%
3.19
3.5
Ramon Tuason
59W–74L career
9%91%0%
3.12
3
Christina Bergstrom
67W–50L career
0%76%24%
2.97

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.