← Teams

VTC-John

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Hong Allen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Lynne Nieda
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Janet Mills
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Dayna Porter
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Kyra John
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Lynn Hendrix
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
—
Hoyun Barr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results11 ties
2022-06-25Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesLynn Hendrix / Rochelle Pluymers vs Katherine Gibbs / Jill Schoner4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-24Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesRochelle Pluymers / Lynn Hendrix vs Melanie Korch / Heather Curtis6-4, 6-2
2022-06-11Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesLynne Nieda / Kyra John vs Colleen Kellogg / Garrene Mcgale6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHoyun Barr / Patricia Nierenberg vs Amy Ouellette / Nina Hanson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-05Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesHong Allen / Dayna Porter vs Inge Marshall / Cara Williams6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKyra John / Lynne Nieda vs Wendy Nakatani / Melissa Smith6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPatti Dybdahl / Lynn Hendrix vs Pat Kaplan / Jennifer Potter1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-21Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesNatalya Ramras / Hong Allen vs Yoko Moore / Tove Maloco6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTina Clancy / Janet Mills vs Elizabeth Burns / Edwardeen Hilts7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatti Dybdahl / Dayna Porter vs Sarah Robertson / Andrea Lamprecht6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesNatalya Ramras / Dayna Porter vs Andrea Robertson / Michelle Zawadzki6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKyra John / Patti Dybdahl vs Laurie Sykes / Renee Schwartz6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHoyun Barr / Patricia Nierenberg vs Kelly Norling / Heather Selis6-4, 6-3
2022-05-13Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesHong Allen / Dayna Porter vs Judi Babcock / Mary Lowblad2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Mills / Lynn Hendrix vs Tina Prassas / Laurence Dupray6-2, 6-2
2022-04-23Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesDayna Porter / Natalya Ramras vs Angie Stromquist / Gabriela McIntosh4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJanet Mills vs Suzanne Chambers6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Hendrix / Hong Allen vs Jin Velasco / Kaie Wellman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatti Dybdahl / Kyra John vs Hilary Johnson / Marian Sy Shamon6-1, 7-5
2022-04-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesHong Allen / Lynne Nieda vs Michele Sutherland / Rebecca McMasters6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTina Clancy / Janet Mills vs Cheri Martes Davis / Andrea Vicino2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHoyun Barr / Lynn Hendrix vs Alison Marr / Suki Birge3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDayna Porter / Natalya Ramras vs Laura Greenberg / Ann Kitchen6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLynne Nieda / Kyra John vs Inge Marshall / Karen Harlow7-5, 7-6
2021-12-03Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLynn Hendrix / Patti Dybdahl vs Christine Moran / Diane Ditmer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Hong Allen
39W–50L career
0%58%42%
3.58
3.5
Lynne Nieda
62W–51L career
1%99%0%
3.28
3.5
Janet Mills
66W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Dayna Porter
81W–74L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Kyra John
42W–40L career
3%96%0%
3.19
3.5
Lynn Hendrix
56W–47L career
11%89%0%
3.12
0
Hoyun Barr
29W–20L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.