← Teams

VTC-Chiu

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
William Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.80
Minou Chau
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.75
Daniel Lamey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Shaoping Lin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
—
Tony Joseph
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Aman Wasu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Mitchell Whitehurst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Patrick Clancy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Stephen Crook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-12-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesShaoping Lin / Molly Shum vs Riley Stricker / Alexis Pond6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTony Joseph / Cindy Rushall vs Roshen Warrier / Hong Jones6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Lamey / Julie Carmena vs Edmund Yuan / Ashley Schneider7-6, 6-3
2024-11-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesShaoping Lin / Molly Shum vs Nicole Griffith / Brian McCarn6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVincent Faustino / Cindy Rushall vs Vickie Maletteri / Scott MacDonald6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWilliam Haynes / Samantha Williams vs Tammy Cofield / Christian Casebeer5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-11-03Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMinou Chau / Patrick Clancy vs Jason Coria Corona Yue / Nicole Partch6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCindy Rushall / Mitchell Whitehurst vs Kyle Cavelti / Catherine Hu6-2, 6-0
2024-10-26Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesStephen Crook / Minou Chau vs Steve Bidwell / Michele O'Brien4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShaoping Lin / Cindy Rushall vs Davis Wilkinson / Karen Ohollaren6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Lamey / Julie Carmena vs Robert Gettle / Kim Hill3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesStephen Crook / Minou Chau vs Vimal Natarajan / Carla Wheeler6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAman Wasu / Cindy Rushall vs Srinivasa Kanamatha / Cathy Gatzke6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Lamey / Julie Carmena vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-06Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesStephen Crook / Minou Chau vs Cate Harrington / Ezra James2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTony Joseph / Molly Shum vs Kacie Wise / Jacob Pompeii6-1, 6-1
2024-09-29Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesPatrick Clancy / Samantha Williams vs Rachel Novak / Austin Cano6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShaoping Lin / Tina Clancy vs Jennifer Witty / Louie Amurao6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMolly Shum / Aman Wasu vs Marina Rubinshteyn / Colin Reingold6-3, 7-5
2024-09-28Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMitchell Whitehurst / Molly Shum vs Andrew Slominski / Michele O'Brien6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Haynes / Tina Clancy vs William Anderson / Brooke Daugherty6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatrick Clancy / Jennifer Bane vs Kim Hill / Thomas Greiner6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
William Haynes
44W–45L career
5%95%0%
4.12
4.5
Minou Chau
115W–106L career
68%32%0%
3.80
4
Daniel Lamey
32W–28L career · type M
8%87%5%
3.75
4
Shaoping Lin
42W–46L career
not enough data
—
4
Tony Joseph
19W–20L career
not enough data
—
4
Aman Wasu
24W–31L career
6%94%0%
3.68
3.5
Mitchell Whitehurst
90W–77L career
0%76%24%
3.53
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Patrick Clancy
25W–36L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Stephen Crook
55W–66L career
2%98%0%
3.21

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.