Search

Sheryl Riley

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
99 matches · 41W–58L · seasons 20192025
Where Sheryl sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Sheryl is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sheryl has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sheryl has gone from the 84th to the 28th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
54.8%
23W–19L · 51.5% of games
3.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 32.1% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.3% of games
7.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 41.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history99 matches
L
Madelyne Bluemmel
2025-06-14 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.016about as expected — took 35% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Kaufman
0.020about as expected — took 63% of games against 67% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-05-25 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.046better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Laura Rosencrantz / Corey Geer
2025-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Kaufman
0.031below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Hannah Riley / Nicole Burrell
2025-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Albright
+0.035better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-03-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Anne Sweeney
+0.002about as expected — took 35% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bridget Raach
0.021below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Nadine Hazard / Lindsey Stafford
2025-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bridget Raach
0.012below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-02-07 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.008about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Molly Littlejohn / Anita Palodichuk
2025-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Morrison
0.024below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jerin Boyer / Geri Marcus
2025-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Crehan
+0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Priester
0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.