Search

Bridget Raach

Camas, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
48 matches · 20W–28L · seasons 20212026
Where Bridget sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Bridget is one of 176 women at 2.5 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 2.5 account for 4% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Bridget has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 2 down.

2.02.53.020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Bridget has gone from the 16th to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
36.4%
12W–21L · 45.7% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.5% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Douglas Hill
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Douglas Hill
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-03-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Albright
+0.177better than expected — took 100% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Kasia Wood / Qin Lian
2025-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kheoshi Owens
0.062below expectation — took 0% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheryl Riley
0.014below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Nadine Hazard / Lindsey Stafford
2025-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheryl Riley
0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-06-22 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.025better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
Kiki Hanover / Sarah Wang
2024-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jane Toolson
0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-05-26 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.006about as expected — took 40% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-04-28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Erin Corzine
2024-03-16 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.051better than expected — took 52% of games against 32% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Wilson
+0.016about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.