← Teams

PTC-Lee/Daoud

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Tim Janes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Richard Nobleman
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Jeny Joseph
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Michael Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Valerie Neill
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Ed de la Fuente
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Christine Egan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Bill Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Katja Daoud
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results10 ties
2024-05-25Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesValerie Neill / Bill Barnes vs Patrick Priest / Lisa Mayer2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Egan / Richard Nobleman vs ROSS GREEN / Theresa Gonzales6-1, 6-1
2024-05-19Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesRichard Nobleman / Christine Egan vs Diana Blebea / Lawrence Cooper6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Navarro / Lynn Lotti vs Michael Rich / Cynthia Ross-Brockett6-3, 6-3
2024-05-18Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Jeny Joseph vs Wei Pan / Alana Rhea6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRose Lee / Richard Nobleman vs Tomoko Langworthy / Ben Yamaguchi6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatja Daoud / Scott Myers vs Amy Hicks / Mike Olson6-1, 6-2
2024-05-11Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesValerie Neill / Tim Janes vs Brooke Kuerbis / James Lang4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathryn Todd / Richard Nobleman vs Dave Brown / Julia Plowman6-0, 6-4
2024-05-10Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesTim Janes / Valerie Neill vs Jeremy Geschwind / Judy Friedman6-0, 6-2
2024-05-04Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Jeny Joseph vs Kristi Tompkins / Craig Tompkins6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBill Barnes / Sheryl Riley vs Dan Pope / Yan Morrissey6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRichard Nobleman / Lynn Lotti vs Keibun Hayashi / Angela Keating6-1, 6-1
2024-04-28Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesEd de la Fuente / Katja Daoud vs Jennifer Bayless / Fenn Bourland6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRichard Nobleman / Rose Lee vs Kip Stevenson / Kathleen Cooney6-1, 4-5
W#3 DoublesBill Barnes / Christine Egan vs Scott Soot / Susan Sienko6-2, 7-5
2024-04-14Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesTim Janes / Rose Lee vs Doug Denney / Ivy Lane6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesValerie Neill / Steve Siegel vs Stephen Drew / Jennifer Trank6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-12Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRichard Nobleman / Jeny Joseph vs Matt McNair / CHRISTINE McNair6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Steve Siegel vs Heather Dale / Jonathan Guinn6-4, 7-5
2024-04-06Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJeny Joseph / Ed de la Fuente vs Lori Merchel / Dave Sato6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Egan / Richard Nobleman vs Denise Butchee / Gerald Snell6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatja Daoud / Bill Barnes vs Kristin Vandehey / Tom Hsu6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Tim Janes
47W–53L career
0%18%82%
3.23
3
Richard Nobleman
51W–36L career
0%87%13%
2.96
3
Jeny Joseph
75W–91L career
0%98%2%
2.87
3
Michael Navarro
27W–39L career
0%97%3%
2.85
3
Valerie Neill
48W–76L career
0%96%3%
2.84
3
Ed de la Fuente
78W–81L career
0%99%0%
2.78
3
Christine Egan
52W–39L career
3%95%2%
2.76
3
Bill Barnes
11W–17L career · type M
2%98%0%
2.73
3
Katja Daoud
71W–70L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.