Search

Cal Szueber

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
135 matches · 72W–63L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.71
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 33 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.0
36 of 52
WA · 3.0
681 of 755

Cal is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cal has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Cal has gone from the 24th to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
58.1%
50W–36L · 52.5% of games
3.0
18.8%
3W–13L · 38.9% of games
6.0mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history135 matches
L
Tyler Grant / Matt Savage
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grey Proctor
+0.021better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jerin Boyer
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grey Proctor
0.022below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Anthony Hoang / Skylar Soon
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grey Proctor
+0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Chris Boyd / Bryan Nester
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grey Proctor
+0.009about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Penny Mclain / Doug Zennmixed
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Adriana McCord
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Erik Wilson / Kenny Ristau
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grey Proctor
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Andrew Jacobs
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.009about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grey Proctor
+0.015about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Jinman Jun
2026-06-07 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.018below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Brady McAtee
2026-05-31 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.005about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
JUN KYU PARK
2026-05-10 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.