Search

Lee Anderson

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
98 matches · 45W–53L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.87
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
95%
stay 3.0
5%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.82. Lower than today’s 2.87 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
155 of 357
OR · 3.0
266 of 600

Lee is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
SAC-Wang/Watson
2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2026
SAC-Cheema/Larson
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2026
SAC-Wheeler/Harvey
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2026
MPTC - Tennis Titans
2025 Hta Spring NA - Mixed Doubles Sunday · 7.0
2025
SAC-Bandi/Elmer
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2025
SAC-Kemple
2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lee has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lee has gone from the 40th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
54%
27W–23L · 50.6% of games
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 32.1% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.1% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.1% of games
6.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
L
Jerin Boyer / Cal Szuebermixed
2026-07-25 · SAC-Wang/Watson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lina Gao
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · SAC-Wang/Watson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Wang
+0.000about as expected — took 61% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · SAC-Wang/Watson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Wang
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · SAC-Wheeler/Harvey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Means
+0.018better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · SAC-Wheeler/Harvey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Olson
+0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Heather Davidson / JIN PARKmixed
2025-11-09 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Roach
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Nadine Hazard / BHAVANI SHANKAR KRISHNA KUMARmixed
2025-10-25 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Na Yung Yu
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-09-27 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Roach
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-08-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.030below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-08-03 · SAC-Kemple · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Tom
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-08-02 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.018better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-27 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.007about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.