← Search

Michelle Roach

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 37W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Roach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-02-28 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-27 · SAC-Kemple · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jinmi Kemple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · SAC-Kemple · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jinmi Kemple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-08 · SAC-Boyce · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lina Gao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-07 · SAC-Kemple · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lina Gao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-24 · SAC-Kemple · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lara Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-11 · SAC-Boyce · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-10 · SAC-Kemple · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Bayless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-11-09 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lee Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-27 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lee Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-28 · Kemple-Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-07-27 · Kemple-Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jinmi Kemple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
80%
8W–2L · 62.4% of games
3.0
40.8%
20W–29L · 46.6% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert